Sense of unity
The team moves and acts as one. Team members feel part of something bigger than themselves, and the individual contributions fit together naturally.
Noticeable when you hear 'we' more often than 'I'.
Our method rests on two solid pillars: years of experience in team development and the scientifically validated TeamFlow model. Below you can read how the model is built, what the seven prerequisites and four characteristics mean, what science teaches us about teams in flow and how TeamPacer relates to other methods.
Book an exploratory callEveryone knows the feeling of flow: being so absorbed in what you do that everything seems to run by itself. That exists at team level too. The TeamFlow model, developed and scientifically validated by Dr Jef van den Hout, describes what that shared experience is made of: seven prerequisites that make team flow possible and four characteristics by which you recognise it. These are the eleven axes on which every TeamPacer measurement is built.
The building blocks that make team flow possible; this is where the influence lies.
The recognisable signals that a team is in flow. The effect, not the cause.
Good to know: team flow is not a constant. The experience fluctuates; even strong teams are not in flow all the time. That is exactly why regular measurement is so valuable.
You cannot order a team to trust each other or to feel as one. These characteristics only arise when the underlying prerequisites are in order. What you can do: build purposefully on the prerequisites that lag behind. That is where most movement comes from.
That is why we measure both. The characteristics tell how the team experiences the collaboration right now; the prerequisites tell what you can work on to strengthen that experience.
Three examples from the questionnaire
Within our team...“We all feel safe to take risks.”
Within our team...“We give each other feedback whenever we can.”
Within our team...“Personal goals are compatible with those of the team.”
Team members score the statements anonymously. The results are analysed exclusively at team level, without individual profiles or labels.
Team flow is the moment when all team members simultaneously experience flow in their interdependent tasks, and feel that the team as a whole is in flow. The chance of that is greatest when all seven prerequisites are present. Open a prerequisite for the explanation and the signals by which you recognise it.
Collective ambition grows from team members' reasons to work together, their shared values and the recognition of each other's complementary skills. It is the starting point of team formation and the basis of a shared identity: the reason someone truly feels part of this team. That is why it is the fundamental prerequisite. And it works both ways: a team that experiences flow together wants to experience it again, which makes the ambition grow further.
Where collective ambition is the 'why', the common goal makes it concrete: what do we want to achieve, and when? A rowing team may share drive and solidarity as its ambition, and an Olympic medal as its goal. The more challenging the goal, the better the performance, as long as the team is committed to it, has the means and the goal remains achievable.
Team flow happens at individual and team level at the same time. Personal goals therefore need to fit the team goal and each other: conflicting goals pull a team apart. When team members help shape the team goal and translate it into their own contribution, motivation and performance grow. That way everyone knows how their own work contributes to the whole.
Flow arises from a good balance between challenge and skill. A team is given a task precisely because it is too big or too complex for one person. So it comes down to joining forces: dividing tasks so that every team member is challenged at their own level, while the contributions form one whole. Who can do what, where does someone excel, and how do we bring that together?
Clear and timely feedback is one of the strongest drivers of flow. In a team it must be clear at any moment who does what, how someone is doing and how the team as a whole is doing. That requires feedback on your own task, the shared task and the collaboration itself. Teams with open communication truly listen to each other and respond to what they hear. That lets them respond with agility to the unexpected.
A challenging goal means failure is always possible. In a safe environment team members dare to take on that challenge anyway, without fear of failing or of being judged. Unnecessary risks are removed, but mistakes are part of it: they are a chance to learn. Anyone who risks ridicule or punishment stays within their comfort zone and so does not contribute to team flow.
Team members jointly take responsibility for reaching the common goal with dedication. They keep each other on track, keep distractions out and hold each other to agreements. The result is a focused dynamic in which everyone keeps both their own task and its connection with the work of others in view.
Want to read more about the prerequisites, with examples from practice? Read our article on the seven prerequisites for team flow
The characteristics are the effect, not the cause. You cannot build on them directly, but they do show whether a team is in flow, and whether work on the prerequisites is having an effect. That is why we measure them too.
The team moves and acts as one. Team members feel part of something bigger than themselves, and the individual contributions fit together naturally.
Noticeable when you hear 'we' more often than 'I'.
Team members can count on each other, without checking or caution. They know everyone delivers their part, which lets them give each other room and take risks together.
Noticeable when work is let go of once it has been handed over.
The team experiences moving forward together. There is momentum: every step brings the goal closer, and successes feel like shared successes. That gives energy to keep going.
Noticeable when the team itself can name what it has achieved together recently.
Everyone is fully concentrated on the shared task and at the same time sees how their own work fits into the whole. Distractions fade into the background and time seems to fly.
Noticeable when meetings are about the goal, not side issues.
Teams perform structurally better when they:
That is why we do what we do: bringing teams into flow, so that both the organisation and its people move forward.
There are different ways to work on team development. Many methods look at the individual characteristics of team members. TeamPacer looks at the dynamics of the team as a whole and translates that into a focused improvement plan. Within that, one of the methods below can often be a valuable addition.
What it stands for:
Management Drives makes drives and value patterns visible. It gives insight into what motivates people and how culture influences behaviour.
Difference with TeamPacer:
TeamPacer does not focus on individual drives, but on the actual team process. Not who you are, but how you function together, and how you strengthen that cyclically.
What it stands for:
DISC maps behavioural preferences: Dominance, Influence, Steadiness and Conscientiousness. It helps teams understand each other's communication style better.
Difference with TeamPacer:
TeamPacer does not look at behavioural profiles, but at energy, friction, focus and collective ambition in the here and now. It is less about typing and more about process.
What it stands for:
MBTI categorises personality into 16 types based on preferences (such as introvert/extravert, thinking/feeling). It increases self-insight and mutual understanding.
Difference with TeamPacer:
TeamPacer does not label people. It makes team dynamics measurable and translates insights directly into concrete team actions that return in a fixed improvement cycle.
From Quick Scan to full PACE programme: discover how we translate the TeamFlow model into measurable improvement for your team.
See our approach